[debian-mysql] Proposal: A consistent approach to git repository naming

[James Page]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 13/01/14 22:31, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
> Am 13.01.2014 14:56, schrieb James Page:
> 
> 
> maybe I'm wrong, but that's what branches are for?

Well we could do it that way - however I really like todo:

  debcheckout -a 'pkgname'

and then not have to fiddle around figuring which branch I should be
using for which source package.  I prefer to use branches for releases
of said source package - say a branch for stable updates for a given
package.

I think that sticking to this convention (which I believe is common
place across Debian) is the right thing todo.

- -- 
James Page
Ubuntu and Debian Developer
james.page at ubuntu.com
jamespage at debian.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=lrNm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----