[debian-mysql] Requesting review for last MariaDB 10.6 upload to Debian and pending 10.11 upload to Debian

[Daniel Black]

On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 8:03 AM Otto Kekäläinen <otto at debian.org> wrote:

> > Now with 10.11 in experimental, there are build results for it too:
> >
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mariadb&suite=experimental
> >
> > I can already see that armel and armhf failed. I need help to get
> > these fixed, otherwise there will be no hope of having MariaDB 10.11
> > accepted into Bookworm.
>
> I investigated those myself now and filed as
> https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-30411.
>
>
I already had (
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/2023-January/016183.html
)

Are the Debian architecture teams here? Because the 1-2 line change
requirement was investigated.

Architecture people, please provide a cpu cycles function for
my_time_cycles in
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/tree/10.11/include/my_rdtsc.h along with
the required pre-processor directives for the platform and move the result
into the CPU register required for returning an unsigned long long per the
ELF calling specification for the platform.

Interesting that the sparc didn't pull up the existing implementation. hppa
also missing an implementation.


> I know everybody are probably busy but if we want to pull this off and
> have MariaDB 10.11 in Debian Bookworm, I need help as reviewing test
> results from various Debian QA systems, investigating individual
> issues and fixing them is too much work for one person to do in a
> short time on their free time...
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-mysql-maint/attachments/20230115/20270ad1/attachment.htm>