[Pkg-nagios-devel] nagircbot sponsor?

[Alexander Wirt]

John Morrissey schrieb am Sunday, den 26. December 2010:

> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 08:18:38AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > John Morrissey schrieb am Thursday, den 23. December 2010:
> > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 06:37:37PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > > > Should be possible, do you want to maintain the package inside our
> > > > nagios/icinga team?
> > > 
> > > Sounds good to me. What would it involve, beyond using the team's git
> > > repository for revision control?
> > 
> > Not much, we normally set the maintainer to the pkg-nagios group and pin
> > all hooks to our cia bot and the commit mailinglist. Thats all.
> 
> Ok, sounds good. I've set the maintainer to pkg-nagios in my latest
> nagircbot packaging.
> 
> > > Also, I have the packaging ready if you (or anyone else) has time to
> > > review it:
> > > 
> > >     http://horde.net/~jwm/debian/nagircbot_0.0.32-1.dsc
> > 
> > More or less the packaging is fine. But that the bot starts unconfigured
> > is not so nice. I see two options here configure the bot (channel, server,
> > ssl, nick...) via debconf (not preferred) or just provide some docs
> > (README.Debian) and disable the bot via /etc/default/nagircbot by default.
> > 
> > Maybe it would be nicer have a more verbose default nagirc bot like:
> [snip]
> > and so on. And then collect the options and build DAEMON_OPTS on the fly. 
> > 
> > What do you think? 
> 
> Good idea. I've updated the packaging at the above URL with
> STATUSFILE/USER/SERVER/NICK/CHANNEL options.
> 
> I didn't provide a README.Debian, since I think the options in
> /etc/default/nagircbot are reasonably clear; do you still think I should add
> a README.Debian?
Took me some time to get back to it, but hey - I uploaded nagirc bot a few
minutes ago. 

Alex