[Pkg-nagios-devel] Bug#942576: RM: icinga2 [armel mips64el mipsel s390x] -- ROM; Unblock testing migration

Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebastic at xs4all.nl
Fri Oct 18 17:57:20 BST 2019


On 10/18/19 3:14 PM, Ansgar wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 14:22 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/18/19 2:11 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:53:22PM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> Please remove icinga2 from armel, mips64el, mipsel & s390x to unblock testing migration due to missing builds.
>>>
>>> Those builds fail with different errors.  Please handle them properly
>>> first.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> These are architectures where icinga2 is unlikely to actually be used.
> 
> I think the build failure on mipsel, armel is missing the `-latomic`
> linker flag on these architectures (and possible some others).  See [1]
> and [2] for similar issues and patches.
> 
>   [1] https://bugs.debian.org/914667
>   [2] https://bugs.debian.org/907106
> 
> It probably reasonable to try and see if that workaround is enough.

Thanks for the tip, it doesn't solve the issue unfortunately, see:

 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=icinga2&arch=armel&ver=2.11.1-2%7Eexp1&stamp=1571416691&raw=0

-latomic is simply added again, it was already present in the previous
build:

 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=icinga2&arch=armel&ver=2.11.1-1&stamp=1571395555&raw=0

> For mips64el and s390x build-dependencies are missing (libboost-
> context-dev).  Removal from these architectures seems reasonable in
> this case; I've not looked why libboost-context-dev (or really
> libboost-context1.67-dev) isn't built on these architectures.

icinga2 should be removed from armel & mipsel as well.

It will return there once the boost and gcc issues are fixed in their
respective packages.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1



More information about the Pkg-nagios-devel mailing list