[Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#282156: marked as done (netatalk: uams_randnum.so not built?)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Mon Nov 23 10:27:09 GMT 2020


Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:24:36 +0100
with message-id <160612707696.2787828.6476994530378576153 at auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#282156: netatalk: uams_randnum.so not built?
has caused the Debian Bug report #282156,
regarding netatalk: uams_randnum.so not built?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
282156: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=282156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Ryan Underwood <nemesis at dbz.icequake.net>
Subject: netatalk: uams_randnum.so not built?
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:00:14 -0600
Size: 1729
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-netatalk-devel/attachments/20201123/7ead893d/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>
Subject: Re: Bug#282156: netatalk: uams_randnum.so not built?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:24:36 +0100
Size: 4859
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-netatalk-devel/attachments/20201123/7ead893d/attachment-0001.mht>


More information about the pkg-netatalk-devel mailing list