[Pkg-netatalk-devel] Netatalk 3.2.2 and 3.2.3

Daniel Markstedt daniel at mindani.net
Sat Aug 3 01:25:45 BST 2024


Jonas,

Not sure if you're seeing this thread or not, but I've prepared another release here:

[https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/tree/debian/3.2.5-1](https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/tree/debian/3.2.5-1?ref_type=tags)

This one has native libmariadb dependency detection, and no longer builds static libraries.
So I have updated control and rules accordingly.

Cheers,
Daniel

On Friday, July 19th, 2024 at 8:27 PM, Daniel Markstedt <daniel at mindani.net> wrote:

> Another update:
>
> Bumped to the newly released upstream 3.2.4. Everything seems to work great now!
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/tree/debian/3.2.4-1
>
> I think this is ready to be uploaded to unstable...
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On Monday, July 15th, 2024 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Markstedt <daniel at mindani.net> wrote:
>
>> Quick update: I found a bunch of deficiencies after moving to Meson so there's no rush to upload this.
>>
>> Most notably, dpkg won't install any of the config files under any circumstances.
>> I'm a bit stumped why this is but will keep investigating...
>>
>> On Sunday, July 14th, 2024 at 4:39 PM, Daniel Markstedt <daniel at mindani.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jonas,
>>>
>>> I have now drafted a 3.2.3-1 release in the debian/latest branch:
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/tree/debian/latest
>>>
>>> Would you mind looking over the state of the code and judge if it is in good enough shape to be uploaded?
>>> I inspected the before-after list of files with `dpkg -c' and couldn't spot any unexpected changes caused by the move to Meson.
>>>
>>> One thing I wanted to ask your advice about:
>>> The changelog now defines intermediate releases 3.2.0~ds-1, 3.2.1~ds-1, and 3.2.2-1, which weren't actually uploaded.
>>> Does it make sense to keep these in the changelog, or shall I refactor the totality of the changes between 3.1.18~ds-1 and 3.2.3-1 in one big changelog?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, July 10th, 2024 at 6:53 PM, Daniel Markstedt <daniel at mindani.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jonas,
>>>>
>>>> A few days ago I integrated the latest Netatalk 3.2.2 tag with the Salsa repo.
>>>> You should be pleased to hear that all traces of the SSLeay license have been eliminated from the codebase.
>>>>
>>>> Right now I'm working towards a 3.2.3 release of Netatalk.
>>>> While attempting to build Netatalk with debuild using the Meson build system,
>>>> lintian pointed out that we're setting rpath on a bunch of binaries, where we shouldn't.
>>>> I have a fix in the pipeline now, plus a few others. Just needs a little more polish.
>>>>
>>>> Once I've released and integrated 3.2.3, I would want to get it into testing for Trixie!
>>>> This way we can restore functionality of the DHX UAM in the Debian package, which I'm excited about.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-netatalk-devel/attachments/20240803/4ce47a4f/attachment.htm>


More information about the pkg-netatalk-devel mailing list