[Pkg-netatalk-devel] Netatalk 3.2.2 and 3.2.3

[Daniel Markstedt]

Another update:

Bumped to the newly released upstream 3.2.4. Everything seems to work great now!

https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/tree/debian/3.2.4-1

I think this is ready to be uploaded to unstable...

Cheers,
Daniel

On Monday, July 15th, 2024 at 8:13 PM, Daniel Markstedt <daniel at mindani.net> wrote:

> Quick update: I found a bunch of deficiencies after moving to Meson so there's no rush to upload this.
>
> Most notably, dpkg won't install any of the config files under any circumstances.
> I'm a bit stumped why this is but will keep investigating...
>
> On Sunday, July 14th, 2024 at 4:39 PM, Daniel Markstedt <daniel at mindani.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonas,
>>
>> I have now drafted a 3.2.3-1 release in the debian/latest branch:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/netatalk-team/netatalk/-/tree/debian/latest
>>
>> Would you mind looking over the state of the code and judge if it is in good enough shape to be uploaded?
>> I inspected the before-after list of files with `dpkg -c' and couldn't spot any unexpected changes caused by the move to Meson.
>>
>> One thing I wanted to ask your advice about:
>> The changelog now defines intermediate releases 3.2.0~ds-1, 3.2.1~ds-1, and 3.2.2-1, which weren't actually uploaded.
>> Does it make sense to keep these in the changelog, or shall I refactor the totality of the changes between 3.1.18~ds-1 and 3.2.3-1 in one big changelog?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 10th, 2024 at 6:53 PM, Daniel Markstedt <daniel at mindani.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jonas,
>>>
>>> A few days ago I integrated the latest Netatalk 3.2.2 tag with the Salsa repo.
>>> You should be pleased to hear that all traces of the SSLeay license have been eliminated from the codebase.
>>>
>>> Right now I'm working towards a 3.2.3 release of Netatalk.
>>> While attempting to build Netatalk with debuild using the Meson build system,
>>> lintian pointed out that we're setting rpath on a bunch of binaries, where we shouldn't.
>>> I have a fix in the pipeline now, plus a few others. Just needs a little more polish.
>>>
>>> Once I've released and integrated 3.2.3, I would want to get it into testing for Trixie!
>>> This way we can restore functionality of the DHX UAM in the Debian package, which I'm excited about.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-netatalk-devel/attachments/20240719/65e9ae21/attachment.htm>