[pkg-netfilter-team] Adopting xtables-addons

[Arturo Borrero Gonzalez]

On 2020-10-19 09:53, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> On 2020-09-06, at 09:51:22 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
>> On 2020-08-26, at 11:21:23 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>>> On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 11:20:40 +0100 Jeremy Sowden wrote:
>>>> There is a RFA bug for xtables-addons (cc'ed):
>>>>
>>>>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910000
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking about offering to adopt the package, but I'm still
>>>> a bit of a novice at maintaining packages in Debian, so although
>>>> it's fairly stable and doesn't see a lot of activity upstream, it
>>>> occurred to me that it might make more sense for it to be adopted
>>>> by the Netfilter team and to offer to help out in that context.
>>>>
>>>> Does this seem like a good idea?  Shall I add it to
>>>> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks?
>>>
>>> Please go ahead.
>>>
>>> I just created this in the wiki:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-netfilter/tasks#Task:_xtables-addons_refresh
>>
>> Thanks!  You got my surname wrong, btw: right letters, wrong order. :)
>>

Fixed!

>> I've pushed a lot of changes, including work to package the latest
>> upstream release, to my fork of the old Salsa repo:
>>
>>   https://salsa.debian.org/azazel/xtables-addons
>>
>> What is the next step towards getting it into the new repo?
> 
> Please forgive the gentle nudge, but some feedback would be appreciated.
> 

Sorry for the delay.

I just invited you to be a maintainer in the
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-netfilter-team/pkg-xtables-addons repository.

Ping me if you find you don't have permissions for something.

Once you are happy with the package code, feel free to push the code to the
pkg-netfilter-team repo and start using in from that moment onwards.

All links in files in the debian/ dir should point to this pkg-netfilter-team
repo (i.e, VCS-* etc). Please also use the common maintainer address like in any
other package in the team.

Unrelated to your package, we would eventually need to move to a more modern
approach for the Maintainer: address, probably using the tracker.d.o address. I
didn't pay enough attention to this and I'm not sure what is the right path.

regards.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-netfilter-team/attachments/20201021/cc2d6ca1/attachment.sig>