[Pkg-nginx-maintainers] Bug#1025763: Bug#1025763: nginx: do nginx-extras nginx-full nginx-core nginx-light still make sense ?

[Thomas Ward]

Unless we have confirmed that these 'flavors' don't rely on non-dynamic modules that need compiled in at compile time I generally am in agreement.  There were options enabled at some flavors that are not invseparately packaged modules because they needed to be in the executable at compile time.

Which means we need to validate that all modules still in the flavors are actually compiled into plain nginx.  We also need to make sure the path of upgrade works still too.  (nginx-extras to just nginx and stuff)



Sent from my Galaxy



-------- Original message --------
From: Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org>
Date: 12/8/22 13:33 (GMT-05:00)
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org>
Subject: [Pkg-nginx-maintainers] Bug#1025763: nginx: do nginx-extras nginx-full nginx-core nginx-light still make sense ?

Source: nginx
Version: 1.22.1-3
Severity: wishlist

With all modules being built in their own separate packages,
it would be less confusing to have just a "nginx" package,
and let users install the modules they need.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.0.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

_______________________________________________
Pkg-nginx-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-nginx-maintainers at alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-nginx-maintainers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-nginx-maintainers/attachments/20221208/9a5757bc/attachment.htm>