[Pkg-nginx-maintainers] nginx 1.22.1-6

[Jan Mojzis]

> On 23. 1. 2023, at 9:28, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Le lun. 23 janv. 2023 à 08:27, Jan Mojzis <jan.mojzis at gmail.com <mailto:jan.mojzis at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> 
> 
>> On 22. 1. 2023, at 16:10, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org <mailto:kapouer at melix.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le dim. 22 janv. 2023 à 13:29, Jérémy Lal <kapouer at melix.org <mailto:kapouer at melix.org>> a écrit :
>> Hi Jan,
>> 
>> Le sam. 21 janv. 2023 à 08:40, Jan Mojzis <jan.mojzis at gmail.com <mailto:jan.mojzis at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> 
>> new version of nginx 1.22.1-6 is ready and will be upload  to the unstable soon.
>> The main change in the package is the move of the nginx binary to the new nginx-bin package.
>> And the nginx-{light,core,extras} packages are replaced by metapackages and marked as deprecated
>> 
>> 
>> changelog:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx/-/blob/master/debian/changelog <https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx/-/blob/master/debian/changelog>
>> 
>> Looks correct.
>> It's a bit difficult to check if dependencies are correctly declared, so anyone feeling comfortable with that should check it out.
>> 
>> A remark:
>> the long descriptions + NEWS are more than enough information about what is happening with the metapackages.
>> I really don't think the postinst warnings are acceptable.
> 
> removed
> 
> thank you
>> Additional suggestions for the metapackages descriptions:
>> -  shorten them, now we don't need to know that much ?
>> - append "this metapackage can be safely removed"
>> but those are not as important.
>> 
>> Is nginx-common needed now ? All its files could go to nginx-bin.
> 
> I agree nginx-common is not needed now.
> But the question is if nginx-bin is a proper replacement for common files.
> If it's not better to combine the binaries+configurations+init into the nginx package (back to standard setup).
> But this will be even more complicated for testing due to historical dependencies.
> 
> Fine, if it's simpler to keep it like that for the moment.
> 
> Jérémy
> 
> 
> 

Before the 1.22.1-6 release, I tested a variant without the new nginx-bin package.
Binaries in "nginx" package instead of "nginx-bin".
And it's a much more straightforward option.

And I'm going to prepare the upload, first to the experimental,
version 1.22.1-6~exp1.

Jan



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-nginx-maintainers/attachments/20230204/436ef132/attachment.htm>