Bug#685321: [SPAM:###] Bug#685321: Package nvclock talks about how binary (non-free) driversare required for access
Russ Allbery
rra at debian.org
Sun Aug 19 18:09:20 UTC 2012
"Grant H." <sirgrant at member.fsf.org> writes:
> Stefano Zacchiroli has called for a "Free-ness" assessment to work with
> the FSF on getting Debian endorsed[1]. According to the Guidelines for
> Free System Distributions a free system can't direct users to the use of
> nonfree programs [2].
> Three packages from the source "nvclock" indicate that non-free software
> is required for some sort of access. In their description they state: "
> The official binary NVIDIA drivers are required for accesses other than
> by root. "[3][4][5]
> This language making nonfree software seem required should be omitted or
> altered.
I think this is completely silly. (And I say that as someone who has been
a member and supporter of the FSF for years.) That description is clear
functionality information that's relevant to people installing the package
and explains the Suggests. A definition of "freeness" that requires
withholding useful information from users is not one that I can agree with
or support.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel
mailing list