Bug#685617: Allow co-installation of nvidia-kernel-dkms and nvidia-kernel-legacy-173xx-dkms
Andreas Beckmann
debian at abeckmann.de
Wed Aug 22 22:38:53 UTC 2012
On 2012-08-23 00:18, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de> writes:
>> Switching between current and legacy is done by reconfiguring the nvidia
>> alternative (/usr/lib/nvidia/nvidia) - can't that be used by the module
>> load script to select the "right" module?
> In theory yes. But there are several problems:
> - plain alternatives are not possible because the files (the compiled
> kernel modules) don't necesserily exist even if the package is
No, I didn't want to install alternatives for the kernel module, just
get the status of the alternative (update-alternatives --query nvidia)
to do the correct selection.
> (why not just select the best module if
> we can).
because the module must match the xorg driver and libGL
> To be honest I did not look at the -source packages too closely. I'm not
> sure if they are still relevant.
They are not going away :-)
> Dkms is IMHO the far superior and easier alternative.
But not suitable for all applications ...
> But anyway the -source packages are already
> co-installable AFAICS.
The -source packages are co-installable, but the generated module
packages are not.
> I don't know if there is a good way to modify the
> build system so that the module is renamed. As I think the -source
> packages are mostly relevant for manual builds I'm not even sure if it's
> a good idea to do such a modification there.
Having the -dkms and -source package building different modules (or
naming them differently) is a bad idea.
> Agreed. Backports to wheezy would be cool though.
Planned.
Andreas
More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel
mailing list