Bug#799948: glx-alternatives_0.6.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Diederik de Haas didi.debian at cknow.org
Tue Oct 6 12:08:04 UTC 2015


On Tuesday 06 October 2015 11:13:10 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-10-06 01:12, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > How about bug nrs #800051, 800327, 800550 and 800705?
> > They looked like the same issue to me and most confirmed that adding the
> > DM user to the video group fixed it (some haven't responded yet).
> 
> Having a workaround is nice but we are missing understanding why this
> happens depending on the way X is configured for nvidia.

True, and I understand the temporary reversal as a workaround.

What I actually meant was: shouldn't those bugs be merged and/or marked as 
affecting package X/Y/Z? Because it looks like quite a number of bugs are 
being filed for what looks to be the same reason. 
Another one was filed just over an hour ago: 801106
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-nvidia-devel/attachments/20151006/f2e4e422/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list