post-352 drivers

Andreas Beckmann anbe at debian.org
Tue Feb 2 12:00:06 UTC 2016


On 2016-02-02 12:30, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On 1 February 2016 at 19:45, Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org> wrote:
>> Regarding conftest.sh: given the new upstream build system, can we just
>> switch to using upstream's conftest.sh instead of patching around it and
>> brewing our own conftest.h? Although it does not work out of the box ...
>> probably due to the path layout with the -common headers packages. But
>> maybe we can just patch that?
> 
> It would be great if we could, as it would make maintenance so much
> easier. I've seen you already committed some changes to svn/355,
> that's great, I'll give it a spin as well tonight or tomorrow.

This just needed some understanding how it works internally ... and that
we kept calling into the build system in a way that "broke" conftest.sh
:-( , predating my maintenance takeover.

355.11+svn successfully survived my build-against-50-kernel-headers on
amd64 test. Not sure whether any of these modules actually works :-)

BTW, can you test whether we still need the ld.bfd patch? Some years ago
modules built with ld.gold were broken, see bug referenced in the patch.


Andreas



More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list