Bug#814654: /dev/dri/card0: failed to set DRM interface version 1.4: Permission denied
Luca Boccassi
luca.boccassi at gmail.com
Sun Feb 14 12:32:46 UTC 2016
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 18:16 +0000, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote:
> Package: nvidia-driver
> Version: 352.79-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear maintainer,
Hi,
> When updating the nvidia-driver package to 352.79-2 from 352.79-1, primusrun and optirun
> become unusable and return an error:
> primus: fatal: Bumblebee daemon reported: error:
> [XORG] (EE) /dev/dri/card0: failed to set DRM interface version 1.4: Permission denied
>
> I performed a full uninstall of every nvidia related package and upon their reinstallation,
> the bug still remained.
Your logs show that you have configured bumblebee to use Nouveau, so
this has nothing to do with the nvidia-driver* packages:
dmesg:
> [ 27.742371] VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method
\_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle
> [ 27.742465] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GM107 (1171b0a2)
<<<<<<<<<< /var/log/Xorg.8.log >>>>>>>>>>
[ 2201.675] (II) NOUVEAU driver Date: Tue Dec 8 15:52:25 2015 +1000
> [ 2201.675] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families :
> [ 2201.675] RIVA TNT (NV04)
> [ 2201.675] RIVA TNT2 (NV05)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 256 (NV10)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 2 (NV11, NV15)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 4MX (NV17, NV18)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 3 (NV20)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 4Ti (NV25, NV28)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce FX (NV3x)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 6 (NV4x)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 7 (G7x)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce 8 (G8x)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce GTX 200 (NVA0)
> [ 2201.675] GeForce GTX 400 (NVC0)
> [ 2201.675] (II) [drm] nouveau interface version: 1.3.1
> [ 2201.676] (EE) Unknown chipset: NV117
If you want to use the proprietary driver, you need to configure so
in /etc/bumblebee/bumblebee.conf.
Once you do that, please run update-glx --configure glx and select
"bumblebee" to make sure all the links are up to date. If you still have
problems, please report back including the content
of /etc/bumblebee.conf and the output of reportbug --template
nvidia-driver.
> Earlier today a bug with the same description was submitted (#814630), except that it targeted
> the package in experimental (the 355 version of the driver). I commented on the bug, but the bug
> was apparently merged into #813565 and my comment lost.
That bug report showed in the log a Xorg ABI problem, which is tied to
355, which was already reported in 813565, hence the merge.
> I am resubmitting this bug with the hopes that the maintainers of the package will now know that
> the regression exists both in 352.79-2 and 355.
>
> I would also like the experimental and/or unstable branch to target the newest short-lived driver
> release by the upstream, instead of lagging behind in features compared to the newest long-lived
> release, however that's just a wish.
There were huge changes in the structure of the drivers which required
extensive changes to packaging. At some point a new version will arrive
in experimental, we are working on it. Please be patient.
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-nvidia-devel/attachments/20160214/2aaa0d41/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel
mailing list