Bug#827391: nvidia-driver: Add support to Nvidia GeForce 10xx GPUs w/ driver 367.27
Luca Boccassi
luca.boccassi at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 13:49:08 UTC 2016
On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 19:46 +0200, hikaru.debian at web.de wrote:
> It turned out, I had extra characters in my debian/rules file, most likely due
> to a mistake while copying the patch from the wiki. This crippled my tar
> command, but didn't make it completely useless.
> So much for "following instructions". ;-)
> Thanks for your patience!
>
> In the end I manually installed these packages:
>
> libegl1-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libegl-nvidia0_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libgl1-nvidia-glx_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libgles1-glvnd-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libgles2-glvnd-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libglvnd-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libglx0-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libglx-nvidia0_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libnvidia-eglcore_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> libnvidia-ml1_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> nvidia-alternative_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> nvidia-driver_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> nvidia-driver-bin_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> nvidia-kernel-dkms_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> nvidia-kernel-support_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> nvidia-vdpau-driver_367.27-1_amd64.deb
> xserver-xorg-video-nvidia_367.27-1_amd64.deb
>
>
> I also needed these packages from jessie-backports:
>
> glx-alternative-nvidia
> libvdpau1
> nvidia-kernel-common
> nvidia-modprobe
>
>
> It wasn't necessary, but I thought it wouldn't hurt, to install
> nvidia-installer-cleanup from the backports too.
>
> Now I have this list of packages installed:
>
> # dpkg -l | grep nvidia
> ii glx-alternative-nvidia 0.7.3~bpo8+1 amd64 allows the selection of NVIDIA as GLX provider
> ii libegl-nvidia0:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary EGL libraries
> ii libegl1-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary EGL stub libraries
> ii libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL libraries
> ii libgles1-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 1.x stub libraries
> ic libgles1-nvidia:amd64 340.96-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 1.x libraries
> ii libgles2-glvnd-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 2.x stub libraries
> ic libgles2-nvidia:amd64 340.96-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary OpenGL|ES 2.x libraries
> ii libglvnd-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary GL vendor neutral libraries
> ii libglx-nvidia0:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary GLX libraries
> ii libglx0-nvidia:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 Vendor neutral GL dispatch library -- libGLX
> ii libnvidia-eglcore:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary EGL core libraries
> ii libnvidia-ml1:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA Management Library (NVML) runtime library
> ii nvidia-alternative 367.27-1 amd64 allows the selection of NVIDIA as GLX provider
> ii nvidia-driver 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA metapackage
> ii nvidia-driver-bin 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA driver support binaries
> ii nvidia-installer-cleanup 20151021+1~bpo8+1 amd64 cleanup after driver installation with the nvidia-installer
> ii nvidia-kernel-common 20151021+1~bpo8+1 amd64 NVIDIA binary kernel module support files
> ii nvidia-kernel-dkms 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary kernel module DKMS source
> ii nvidia-kernel-support 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary kernel module support files
> ii nvidia-legacy-check 367.27-1 amd64 check for NVIDIA GPUs requiring a legacy driver
> ii nvidia-modprobe 358.09-1~bpo8+1 amd64 utility to load NVIDIA kernel modules and create device nodes
> rc nvidia-settings 340.46-2 amd64 tool for configuring the NVIDIA graphics driver
> ii nvidia-support 20151021+1~bpo8+1 amd64 NVIDIA binary graphics driver support files
> ii nvidia-vdpau-driver:amd64 367.27-1 amd64 Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix - NVIDIA driver
> ii xserver-xorg-video-nvidia 367.27-1 amd64 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver
>
>
> I'm wondering about two things:
>
> 1. I still have libgles1-nvidia and libgles2-nvidia from 340 on my system,
> while there are only libgles1-glvnd-nvidia and libgles2-glvnd-nvidia for 367.
> Are the latter two packages equivalent to the former ones or should I have
> packages without "glvnd" for 367?
Can't remember off the top of my head, but there was a lot of
reshuffling due to the glvnd, some of which has not yet been merged up
from 361 to 367. In general if a branch doesn't build a package anymore,
you don't need it and you should remove it.
> 2. Is the old nvidia-settings package (or its removal) a problem?
> I see, there is no 367 svn package. [1]
nvidia-settings is separate and largely independent, it's not strictly
tied to the drivers version, as long as it's somewhat recent it will be
fine
> I also found a GT520 card to test with, so I have something that's actually
> supported by the driver. As far as I can tell, it works fine. The desktop comes
> up and I can play videos using OpenGL via the card.
>
>
> [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-nvidia/packages/nvidia-settings/branches/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-nvidia-devel/attachments/20160712/402191db/attachment.sig>
More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel
mailing list