testing kernel module build in branches/304 and branches/340

Luca Boccassi luca.boccassi at gmail.com
Sun Mar 20 19:46:53 UTC 2016

On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 18:54 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-02-29 17:49, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > So the 304 branch is fine as-is on both architectures, but it's still
> > using our conftest.h system. Were you going to backport the changes to
> > use upstream's conftest.sh to that branch too?
> It looked like that would require significantly more work than 340
> (since treats Kbuild more like a non-standard non-default option), so
> I'll probably leave it alone, it will be EoL-ed end of next year anyway.
> Unless someone comes with a patch of course.


I noticed in the end you did the extra work and converted the 304 branch
too, very nice stuff!

I just ran the usual batch, everything looks fine here. amd64 and i386,
with kernels 3.2, 3.16, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5-rc7, both -dkms and -source.

Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-nvidia-devel/attachments/20160320/75f97ec8/attachment.sig>

More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list