Bug#929521: Conflicts in upgrade to 418.74-1 with optimus setup

[Luca Boccassi]

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 12:25 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2019-05-28 09:40, Stefan Tsanev wrote:
> > I agree with Ghis, maybe a little more information before this
> > update
> > could be in great use here. Some people with bumblebee and enabled
> > multiarch may find difficulties understanding why their system
> > doesn't
> > want to continue updating anymore via apt. I sitll feel odd about
> > this
> > upgrade and I'm glad, that I'm not the only one.
> 
> In most cases you would not care about the removed support for i386.
> You
> would care about removed support for your GPU - you will get notified
> about this (news (always) and debconf (if legacy hardware present)
> and
> that you need to switch to the legacy driver.
> amd64 + foreign arch i386 is not (yet) part of our test matrix ...
> 
> Could someone please define the minimal set of packages to be
> installed
> for a working optimus setup, as there is probably no metapackage
> covering that. I.e. something that I can run in a minimal chroot to
> test
> upgrades afterwards. I need this for both stretch and buster. (And an
> upgrade from stretch usually should result in the buster set being
> installed.)
> 
> e.g.
> 
> stretch# apt-get install --install-recommends bumblebee-nvidia
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andreas

Hi, this should be the list:

bbswitch bumblebee bumblebee-nvidia primus primus-libs primus-libs-ia32 
nvidia-driver-libs-nonglvnd nvidia-driver-libs-nonglvnd-i386

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-nvidia-devel/attachments/20190607/1dbf9c7e/attachment.sig>