[Pkg-opencl-devel] Should I `Provides: opencl-[html|man]-doc`

Mathieu Malaterre malat at debian.org
Tue Jun 2 10:13:32 UTC 2015


On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org> wrote:
> On 2015-05-28 10:28, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> [CC me please]
>>
>> Dear OpenCL team,
>>
>> I am considering updating the opencl documentation packages. Right now
>> src:khronos-opencl-man builds two packages:
>>
>> - opencl-1.2-html-doc
>> - opencl-1.2-man-doc
>>
>> Now that OpenCL 2.0 is out, I considering building two new binary packages:
>>
>> - opencl-2.0-html-doc
>> - opencl-2.0-man-doc
>
> In addition to *-1.2-* or replacing them?

Replacing them.

>> Because `Virtual` package [*] are a new thing to me, I was hoping for
>> some guidance here on what best to do here.
>
> What are the (intended) rdepends of these -doc packages (both real and
> virtual)?

No rdepends (AFAIK). I was just concerned by people loosing the -doc
package just because of a version bump...

2cts



More information about the Pkg-opencl-devel mailing list