[Pkg-opencl-devel] Bug#892428: Bug#892428: pocl: FTBFS on x32: tries to build kernel/host/ for amd64
Andreas Beckmann
anbe at debian.org
Fri Mar 9 04:01:40 UTC 2018
On 2018-03-09 03:55, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Builds of pocl for x32 (admittedly not a release architecture) have
> been failing, as detailed at [1]:
>
> cd "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnux32/lib/kernel/host" && /usr/bin/clang-4.0 --target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -D_CL_DISABLE_HALF -march=x86-64 -emit-llvm -ffp-contract=off -xc -D__CBUILD__ -fno-stack-protector -fno-PIC -DDORENAME -DVEC128 -I "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/kernel/sleef/arch" -I "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/kernel/sleef/libm" -I "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/kernel/sleef/include" -O1 -o "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnux32/lib/kernel/host/x86-64/v128_sleefsimddp.c.bc" -c "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/kernel/sleef/libm/sleefsimddp.c"
> In file included from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/lib/kernel/sleef/libm/sleefsimddp.c:8:
> In file included from /usr/lib/llvm-4.0/bin/../lib/clang/4.0.1/include/stdint.h:61:
> /usr/include/stdint.h:26:10: fatal error: 'bits/libc-header-start.h' file not found
>
> Could you please take a look? (Note the explicit inappropriate
> -march=x86-64.)
So what is the correct setting for x32 here? I think already
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu is wrong ... (and that one gets
autodetected, not overridden by me)
I need to pass an -march or similar option since pocl does not know
about the "use the compilers default" concept (and does the equivalent
of -march=native by default)
Andreas
More information about the Pkg-opencl-devel
mailing list