[Pkg-openldap-devel] Re: the .org proposal or "join forces"
Steve Langasek
vorlon at debian.org
Tue Jan 10 20:31:42 UTC 2006
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:01:38PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Matthijs Mohlmann <matthijs at cacholong.nl> writes:
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Upstream is working on official support for GnuTLS, which should make
> >> the last point much easier when complete. I'm not sure what their
> >> timeframe is, though.
> > That makes the last point easy yes, can you ask the upstream developers
> > in what timeframe they think it's finished ?
> Alas, I checked with them and apparently the funding for this work fell
> through.
> Steve, it looks like your submitted patch for GnuTLS support was rejected
> by the OpenLDAP developers for reasons unrelated to its technical merits
> (some sort of problem with how it was submitted, and questions about
> licensing). Did they ever send you mail about it, as you requested in
> your message, or did it just get closed in the ITS without further
> discussion? I'm not sure if all of the history is reflected in the ITS.
I don't think I ever got any mail from upstream about it; I did chat with
Stephen Frost about trying to move this forward under a license that's
acceptable to upstream, but in the meantime the patch has bitrotted and
needs to be redone.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon at debian.org http://www.debian.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openldap-devel/attachments/20060110/e6ccff2d/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-openldap-devel
mailing list