[Pkg-openldap-devel] Re: Request For Comments: SASL transition
and OpenLDAP
Fabian Fagerholm
fabbe at paniq.net
Mon Oct 23 14:38:25 CEST 2006
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 01:08 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:35:26AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Your point being that it should be possible to simply build the new
> > sasl2 against the current (old-sasl linked) openldap because "new" and
> > "old" sasl2 are supposed to be binary compatible?
>
> Yes, exactly.
You're right, my bad. It builds fine.
What about the other implications of this change? Are you prepared to
work with us to iron out any bugs that may arise from the new version,
aiming for inclusion in etch?
--
Fabian Fagerholm <fabbe at paniq.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openldap-devel/attachments/20061023/c538b33b/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pkg-openldap-devel
mailing list