[Pkg-openldap-devel] Proposed layout for svn.

[Steve Langasek]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:46:31PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

>> openldap-guide sounds like it should be removed.

> Assuming you mean something separate from the admin guide included in a 
> release, I totally agree.  The guide pushed out should match what came with 
> the release.

This refers only to an empty directory in the Debian svn repo which was
never used.

> Also, OpenLDAP 2.4.7 will be out soon.  That would be a good first release 
> to look at the BDB 4.6 migration, and GnuTLS bits to replace the old ldap 
> library packages, etc.

Is there any reason not to look at the existing 2.4.6 for getting a head
start on the GNUTLS bits?  Transitioning everything off of the existing
libldap2 package is going to take some time, and the sooner we get started
the better; so if 2.4.6 is suitable aside from the BDB4.6 concerns, I'd
rather not be blocked on 2.4.7.

On the Ubuntu side, we're hoping to have libldap2 dropped in time for hardy
(the April 2008 release).

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org