[Pkg-openldap-devel] Fwd: a bit of bug triage

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Peter,

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:21:15PM +0100, Peter Marschall wrote:
> I have done a little bit of bug triage last weekend and today
> resulting in followups and patches to some of the bugs.

Thanks for these!  I've followed up (after a bit of delay, obviously :/ ) on
the ones that were still open, taking the actions you've recommended with
the exception of these:

> #502815	Is against slapd from etch. In stable slapd links against
> 	GnuTLS, and the option TLSCACertificatePath is documented
> 	not to work with GnuTLS in the slapd.conf man page.
> 	What to do here:
> 	- mark it wontfix
> 	- closing it ?

It may be documented not to work, but documenting a bug does not mean it's
not a bug. :)  I think this should be left open.

> #383237	Is about a slapd.conf parameter that got dropped in the
> 	2.3 series. Stable now has 2.4.11. 
> 	Why not close this bug ?

It's already tagged 'wontfix', so is off my radar and I'm indifferent to
whether it actually gets closed.

> And my last question: 
> What about a new version 2.4.15-2 i or 2.4.16-1 (once 2.4.16 is out)
> with the patches in
> #496749, #505191,

fixed upstream, and closed as such.

> #498116, 

fixed in the latest upload.

> #517556, #5186{57,59,60} applied ?

Still on my todo list. :/

> Shall I tag / close those bugs that I consider either no bugs
> or fixed in stable / testing?

Bugs fixed in stable / testing can always be closed, provided that you use a
Version: pseudoheader to correctly denote the version that fixes it (i.e.,
avoid incorrectly marking the bug as fixed from oldstable / stable).

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org