[Pkg-openldap-devel] Backporting slapd out of jessie to wheezy possible?

Luca Bruno lucab at debian.org
Tue Nov 25 15:08:36 UTC 2014


On Monday 24 November 2014 21:55:49 Ryan Tandy wrote:

> So far I think I still like this idea better than the alternatives.

Everybody loves hacks ;)
 
> How would you feel about the backport using gnutls28? It's already
> available in wheezy-backports with its dependencies. The benefit is that
> it resolves #368297 and its various relatives; but the downside is that
> installing libgnutls28 from wheezy-backports also pulls in newer nettle,
> hogweed, and p11-kit libraries.

I would say: let's go for gnutls28.
Packages seem mostly updated and in synch with jessie, and we expect some 
issues when using the old ones. I don't think anybody will complain about 
pulling-in some more stuff from bpo.

> Can you elaborate on "Cons: not future-proof" in your earlier message?

Just that this is not a proper solution. 
I am not aware of any issues rigth now, but if we later discover anything else 
related to DB versioning and dumping we would still have to come up with 
another solution. This is mostly a quickly workaround for this specific case.

Nonetheless, it looks like it's our better option at this moment, so let's go 
for it.

Ciao, Luca

-- 
 .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **  | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :'  :   The Universal O.S.    | lucab (AT) debian.org
`. `'`                          | GPG Key ID: 0x4F3BBEBF
  `-     http://www.debian.org 	| Debian GNU/Linux Developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openldap-devel/attachments/20141125/7d47e2a4/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-openldap-devel mailing list