[Pkg-openldap-devel] Dropping SLP support from slapd for Stretch?

[Luca BRUNO]

On Sunday, January 17, 2016 05:07:20 PM Ryan Tandy wrote:

> >As I guess that slapd (and nis) are the main reasons why that library is
> >still floating around, I think it could be the case to just stop enabling
> >it.
> Sounds fine to me, however I haven't checked whether this affects our
> ABI at all. (Looks like it's only a slapd thing, so probably not.) 

I didn't check extensively, but this should only touch slapd internals, yep.

> We should mention it in NEWS.Debian.
 
Definitely.

> So I'm fine with removing it unless/until someone packages OpenSLP 2.0 and
> mentions that they want slapd to support it.

Fine. I'll also drop a note in the OpenSLP bug and somewhere else (d-devel?) 
just to see if anybody is concerned, before taking it out.

Ciao, Luca

-- 
 .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **  | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :'  :   The Universal O.S.    | lucab (AT) debian.org
`. `'`                          | GPG: 0xBB1A3A854F3BBEBF
  `-     http://www.debian.org  | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openldap-devel/attachments/20160118/5f74d76a/attachment.sig>