[Pkg-openssl-devel] Re: Bug#251159: Bug still open?

[Christoph Martin]

Hi Alexis,

Alexis Sukrieh schrieb:
> * Christoph Martin (martin at uni-mainz.de) disait :
> 
>>If I understand this correct the packages has only to be rebuild and no
>>changes have to be make in the sources. What do you want to change in
>>the sources for the NMU?
> 
> Well, I thought the source should have been sync with the binary. Forget
> my mail if that's useless. I was also thinking that a changelog entry
> would have been cleaner than a binary-only NMU.

Yes it would be nice to have the two in sync. However there is a
changelog entry in the binary package for the binary NMU.

> But I must be wrong, sorry for the noise.

No. Thanks for your work. If you think a real NMU would make the case
clearer and speed up the inclusion in testing, go ahead. The maintainer
of cl-tclink is really not responsive.

Cheers
	Christoph

-- 
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail:  Christoph.Martin at Uni-Mainz.DE
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
      Fax: +49-6131-3922856
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20051222/84facae5/signature.pgp