[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#336907: marked as done (openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa.)

Sat Jan 21 19:33:11 UTC 2006

Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:48 +0100
with message-id <20060121193248.GA4725 at roeckx.be>
and subject line openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 19:30:00 +0000
>From kurt at roeckx.be Tue Nov 01 11:29:59 2005
Return-path: <kurt at roeckx.be>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.74] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EX1pX-00056u-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:29:59 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C0E03817A
	for <submit at bugs.debian.org>; Tue,  1 Nov 2005 20:29:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
	by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667903800F
	for <submit at bugs.debian.org>; Tue,  1 Nov 2005 20:29:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id EE03026136; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:29:57 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:29:57 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt at roeckx.be>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa.
Message-ID: <20051101192957.GA25437 at roeckx.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.8a-1
Severity: important

Hi,

It seems that the regression test for sha512 is failing on hppa,
all other regression tests pass.

Kurt

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336907-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 19:32:50 +0000
>From kurt at roeckx.be Sat Jan 21 11:32:50 2006
Return-path: <kurt at roeckx.be>
Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.73])
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F0OTi-0000o3-9S
	for 336907-done at bugs.debian.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:32:50 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A44038363
	for <336907-done at bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
	by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3538A382B1
	for <336907-done at bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id B9F0F26136; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:32:48 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt at roeckx.be>
To: 336907-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: openssl: sha512 regresstion test failed on hppa.
Message-ID: <20060121193248.GA4725 at roeckx.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

I can't reproduce this bug anymore.  The buildd log 0.9.8a-5 for hppa
build with gcc-4.0 4.0.2-5 still shows the failure, trying
0.9.8a-5 now on paer with gcc-4.0 4.0.2-6 doesn't show the
failure anymore.  I assume this is a bug that's been solved in gcc-4.0.

So, I'm going to close this bug.

Kurt