[Pkg-openssl-devel] How come package doubles in size?
Kurt Roeckx
kurt at roeckx.be
Sat Oct 6 17:23:43 UTC 2007
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:19:37PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> How come the uncompressed package size doubles going from 0.9.8e-6 to e-9
> while compressed size increases by just 2k ?
What i see is:
-rw-r--r-- 1 kurt kurt 2196396 2007-08-15 20:02 libssl-dev_0.9.8e-6_amd64.deb
-rw-r--r-- 1 kurt kurt 2191446 2007-09-28 20:33 libssl-dev_0.9.8e-9_amd64.deb
And:
Installed-Size: 6908
Installed-Size: 11572
But comparing the files in the package, I see:
- 525082 usr/lib/libssl.a
- 3298010 usr/lib/libcrypto.a
+ 524738 usr/lib/libssl.a
+ 3280442 usr/lib/libcrypto.a
[...]
- 2331 usr/share/man/man3/BN_add_word.3ssl.gz
+ 2332 usr/share/man/man3/BN_add_word.3ssl.gz
[...]
- 12347 usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/changelog.Debian.gz
+ 12575 usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/changelog.Debian.gz
[...]
- 46139 usr/include/openssl/asn1.h
+ 46728 usr/include/openssl/asn1.h
[...]
- 23863 usr/include/openssl/ocsp.h
+ 23795 usr/include/openssl/ocsp.h
[...]
- 28370 usr/include/openssl/pem.h
+ 27927 usr/include/openssl/pem.h
Which does not explain the difference at all. So I'm guessing
this is some change in either dpkg-dev, or the util that it's
using to calculate that.
Kurt
More information about the Pkg-openssl-devel
mailing list