[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#626060: Bug#626060: openssl: FTBFS on sparc64 due to configuration issue

[Aurelien Jarno]

On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:13:24PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:32:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: openssl
> > Version: 1.0.0d-2
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch
> > User: debian-sparc at lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: sparc64
> > 
> > openssl FTBFS on sparc64 with a testsuite failure. This is due to a
> > small configuration issue, fixed by the patch below. I changed
> > SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG into BN_LLONG, as it is done for debian-sparc-v9 or
> > solaris64-sparc-v9. Could you please apply this patch in the next
> > upload. Thanks in advance.
> 
> What is the size of a "long"?  64 bit? Then as far as I know you
> should use SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG.

Yes, the size of a long is 64 bit. If in this case SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG
should be used, do you know why solaris64-sparcv9-gcc, 
solaris64-sparcv9-cc, BSD-sparc64 and linux64-sparcv9 use BN_LLONG? 
I basically did the change based on them, and it fixed the testsuite
issue.
 
> If long is 64 bit, as it is on most of our 64 bit ports, I would
> look into why it's failing instead.
> 

The problem is that test BN_add. I will try to investigate why.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien at aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net