[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#638137: Bug#638137: Please transition openssl for multiarch
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at canonical.com
Sat Jan 7 00:09:27 UTC 2012
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:13:01PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:50:45PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > So I've uploaded the patch.
> > Looks like this bug wasn't closed, thanks to the typo "Closs: #xxxx"
> So closing it now instead.
> > Shouldn't "openssl" be Multi-Arch: foreign?
> A package with a Depends on openssl should work with any of
> the arches as far as I know. So I think think that "foreign"
> would do the right thing in that case, but I'm not really sure
> enough about it to change it.
> Steve, do you have any comment about this?
"foreign" is correct for any package that provides only an exec() interface
to its reverse-dependencies; however in general I've only been pushing such
a change for packages that have actual multi-arch: same reverse-dependencies
(i.e., libraries as revdeps), since otherwise it just makes the packages
file bigger for no discernable benefit.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20120106/47dc22f8/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Pkg-openssl-devel
mailing list