[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#698447:

Douglas Calvert dfc at douglasfcalvert.net
Tue Feb 12 05:34:09 UTC 2013


I just installed 1.0.1e on amd64 and it does not seem that
enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128 made it in. When do you think it will hit
unstable?


OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013
built on: Mon Feb 11 18:52:45 UTC 2013
platform: debian-amd64
options:  bn(64,64) rc4(8x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS
-D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g
-O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-z,relro
-Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -DMD32_REG_T=int -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2
-DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m
-DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM
-DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
OPENSSLDIR: "/usr/lib/ssl"


tor gives the following warning:

Feb 12 00:28:13.000 [notice] We were built to run on a 64-bit CPU,
with OpenSSL 1.0.1 or later, but with a version of OpenSSL that
apparently lacks accelerated support for the NIST P-224 and P-256
groups. Building openssl with such support (using the
enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128 option when configuring it) would make ECDH
much faster.



More information about the Pkg-openssl-devel mailing list