[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

[Chris Knadle]

Kurt Roeckx:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:36:46PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote:
>> Kurt Roeckx:
>>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +0000, Chris Knadle wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized
>>>> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure
>>>> out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when mumble_1.2.10-2 works.
>>>> And I just tested -- mumble_1.2.10-2 works with openssl_1.0.2d-3.
>>>> snapshot.debian.org has the before-and-after binNMU here:
>>>
>>> I assume you mean 1.0.2d-1 there.  The soname changed between -1
>>> and -3 you actually get a different binary package.
>>
>> Let me be more specific: mumble_1.2.10-2 that was built with
>> openssl_1.0.2d-1 works fine with openssl 1.0.2d-3 installed -- yet
>> mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 that was /built/ with openssl_1.0.2d-3 does not.
> 
> Please note the "openssl" binary package version doesn't change
> anything.  You don't depend on it, you use the library.
> 
> Mumble_1.2.10-2 uses the binary package "libssl1.0.0" (version
> 1.0.2d-1) while mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 uses libssl1.0.2 (version
> 1.0.2d-3).

Ah.  Yes -- verified.
I guess that leaves only the openssl regression testing.

   -- Chris

-- 
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle at coredump.us