[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#686470: marked as done (libssl1.0.0: uses SHA256 instead of SHA384 for 384-bit EC key)

Debian Bug Tracking System owner at bugs.debian.org
Fri Dec 23 12:36:03 UTC 2016


Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:32:44 +0100
with message-id <20161223123244.wtlcwdgulvbb7uw4 at breakpoint.cc>
and subject line Re: Bug#686470: libssl1.0.0: uses SHA256 instead of SHA384 for 384-bit EC key
has caused the Debian Bug report #686470,
regarding libssl1.0.0: uses SHA256 instead of SHA384 for 384-bit EC key
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
686470: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686470
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals at crustytoothpaste.net>
Subject: libssl1.0.0: uses SHA256 instead of SHA384 for 384-bit EC key
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 00:46:38 +0000
Size: 5384
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20161223/d34a013f/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian at breakpoint.cc>
Subject: Re: Bug#686470: libssl1.0.0: uses SHA256 instead of SHA384 for 384-bit EC key
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 13:32:44 +0100
Size: 2821
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20161223/d34a013f/attachment-0001.mht>


More information about the Pkg-openssl-devel mailing list