[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#827061: transition: openssl

[Ondřej Surý]

JFTR cyrus-sasl2 should not fail with openssl 1.0, so I'll fix that
quickly if needed.

O.
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej at sury.org>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure, privacy-aware,
fast DNS(SEC) resolver
Vše pro chleba (https://vseprochleba.cz) – Mouky ze mlýna a potřeby pro
pečení chleba všeho druhu

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017, at 13:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-02-01 22:18:07 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Currently I am rebuilding testing with the same set of package against
> > libssl-dev provided by libssl1.0-dev. After that I retry the failed
> > packages above where I am not sure why they failed (mostly I suspect the
> > parallel) case.
> > Do you want a complete testing rebuild or another set of packages?
> 
> it is at [0] and a retry of all failed with -j1 at [1]. I had just a
> quick look:
> - perl fails in the test suite but that ist "okay". It builds against
>   1.0 but it B-D are built against 1.1 and perl exposes the openssl ABI
>   as-is. So rebuilding it in the right order should avoid it.
> 
> - a few packages like cfengine3, ldns, freelan, duo-unix, dogecoin,
>   dsniff and cyrus-sasl2 seem like they compile with 1.1 but do not
>   compile against 1.0 since they expect 1.1 functions to be around.
>   There may be more, I had a quick look. The build succeeded with 1.1
>   earlier.
> 
> - some of globus-* and lcmaps-* packages fail and I am not sure if they
>   can't deal with 1.0 anymore or if it is similar to perl where
>   everything has to be moved to 1.0 in the right order.
> 
> [0]
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0/
> [1]
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0-retry/
> 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Julien
> 
> Sebastian