[Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#754513: RFP: libressl -- SSL library, forked from OpenSSL

Michael Stone mstone at debian.org
Mon Oct 16 17:07:43 UTC 2017


On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:29:09PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>Out of all of these, I think the option that I think has the fewest
>downsides overall is to convince people to package LibreSSL, but I'm not
>myself in a position to contribute to that effort.
>
>Does anyone have thoughts or other options, or want to help?

My understanding is that the libressl project does not support a release 
for the length of a debian release cycle, and does not commit to API 
stability for debian-cycle periods. (The openbsd model historically is 
to break ABI and even API between releases, in order to minimize 
compatability code, which works with their rebuild-the-world release 
model.) Is there any sign that if debian packages libressl in order to 
use openssh, debian would not end up being the de facto maintainers of 
an unsupported years-old libressl release by the end of a debian 
stable release cycle (not to mention debian LTS)? I think that in 
practical terms that would leave us worse off than settling on a 
compatability layer that's shared with other distributions.

Mike Stone



More information about the Pkg-openssl-devel mailing list