[Pkg-openssl-devel] Comments regarding openssl_3.0.0~~alpha1-1_amd64.changes

[Scott Kitterman]

On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 5:24:09 PM EDT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-06-08 21:32:52 [+0000], Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I am going to accept this upload since it is aimed at Experimental, but
> > please look into the lintian error/warnings and correct them in a future
> > upload. Particularly the error should be fixed or overridden if it's
> > wrong (and a bug filed on the lintian package).
> > 
> > ---- lintian 2.79.0~bpo10+1 check for openssl_3.0.0~~alpha1-1.dsc ----
> > W: openssl source: missing-file-from-potfiles-in libssl1.1.templates
> 
> I have this on my list.
> 
> > W: openssl source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright artistic
> > (paragraph at line 23) W: openssl source:
> > missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-1+ (paragraph at line 23)
> > W: openssl source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+
> > (paragraph at line 19)
> I fixed these.
> 
> > ---- lintian 2.79.0~bpo10+1 check for libssl3_3.0.0~~alpha1-1_amd64.deb
> > ---- E: libssl3: no-debconf-config
> 
> On my list.
> 
> > W: libssl3: link-to-shared-library-in-wrong-package
> > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.3
> > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so W: libssl3:
> > link-to-shared-library-in-wrong-package
> > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.3 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so
> fixed.
> 
> > W: libssl3: postinst-uses-db-input
> 
> on my list.
> 
> > W: libssl3: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites
> > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/engines-3/capi.so
> fixed.
> 
> > Additionally, while the Apache 2.0 license does not require copyright
> > attributions to be distributed with the binaries, it should be correct and
> > it is still preferable that it be complete.
> > 
> > This OpenSSL Project Authors copyright is listed with a start year of
> > 1995,
> > not 1998.
> 
> > The following additional copyright holders are not listed and should be:
> …
> 
> I added them all and merged multiple years into one line per copyright
> holder. According to
>   
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#copyrigh
> t-field
> 
> it is okay.

Yes.  Thanks for the follow-up.

Scott K
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-openssl-devel/attachments/20200617/f606284d/attachment-0001.sig>