[Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Bug#941708: ITP: nextcloud-server -- Nextcloud folder synchronization tool (server)
antonio.e.russo at gmail.com
Fri Oct 4 16:14:18 BST 2019
On 10/4/19 9:07 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think that nextcloud-server-installer would be a better package name.
Yeah, that would make sense.
> Also, presumably you are targeting the contrib section rather than the
> main section.
Yes, this would be contrib.
> How would you feel about an actual packaging of the server (rather than
> an installer) that used fastrack.debian.net?
> Fastrack is intended to handle products where the security lifecycle is
> too short for Debian releases.
I'm guessing this doesn't get into Debian proper at all then? Because I
wouldn't in good conscience let such a package enter the release cycle
(there's no way I could support it).
I did not even know about fastrack, so packaging there may be of limited
value (until it is further publicized, but I guess that's a chicken-or-egg
I'm not necessarily opposed to actually packaging the server, but it has
node dependencies (and there's really no way I can even begin to tame
Will fastrack be OK with a build that is basically npm install? I can try
building something like that.
More information about the Pkg-owncloud-maintainers