[Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] Bug#718045: Missing dependency

David Prévot taffit at debian.org
Wed Oct 9 16:12:56 UTC 2013


<20131004101952.Horde.Iz3pmetfXPajZu67VfrxCg1 at mail.das-netzwerkteam.de>
<20131004133014.GB29858 at gwolf.org> <20131005161432.GA35516 at gwolf.org>
<5253A79F.6020109 at cyconet.org> <20131003134638.GB5227 at trismegisto.universo>

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
>   I've noticed about the (just baked) backport of owncloud. Thank you very much
> for it.
> 
>   Unfortunately, there are some dependencies missing. You may take a look at [0]
> where I can count up to 12 dependant packages not found.
> 
>   I wonder if there's something that can be done about this.
> 
>   [0] http://packages.debian.org/wheezy-backports/owncloud

Looks like this point had already been raised on debian-backports@
(thanks Mike for the pointer).

	https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2013/10/msg00006.html

That makes me wonder: are the people taking care of these backports
willing to take care and follow up on backports related bug reports
filled against owncloud (and its build-)dependencies), such as this one?
I believe it would be the best course of action, making the issue public
in a place were people caring about owncloud will find information and
making it easier for the people from the teams to help each other.
If the answer is “no”, on the other hand, should we just close this bug
report and encourage people interested into owncloud backports to file
further bug reports directly into the backports mailing list following
the documentation?

	http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3

Regards

David


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-owncloud-maintainers/attachments/20131009/3014de63/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-owncloud-maintainers mailing list