[Pkg-owncloud-maintainers] dompdf in OwnCloud
awilliam at redhat.com
Wed Jan 1 18:59:43 UTC 2014
On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 14:52 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> Le 31/12/2013 13:51, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 11:00 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> >> [ Following up to the mailing list with Adam permission, please keep
> >> him CC on reply. Keeping full context of the part I’m replying to for
> >> people starting to follow now. ]
> >> Le 31/12/2013 03:48, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> >>> […] the only path patch we have that you don't is for
> >>> Pimple, but I'm not sure if you've unbundled that (yet).
> >> Indeed we haven’t unbundled it yet (it’s really a short one IIRC)
> For the record, Pimple one class with about 50 lines of code, I don’t
> believe Debian ftpmasters would be happy if we introduce it, especially
> since nothing but ownCloud seems to currently use it in Debian. If there
> is a good reason to package it, please speak up (I may volunteer to take
> care of it if needed). I believe phpass fall into the same category…
I think we just got ours as part of OC unbundling. The 'makes sense to
unbundle' line is definitely a bit blurry...I'm never quite sure where
to draw it. Gregor seems to take an "UNBUNDLE ALL THE THINGS" approach,
I lose patience when it's a couple of files that clearly have no sane
upstream distribution anyway...
I've sent that patch upstream anyway as I believe it's upstreamable:
> > So, the best web 'portal' would I guess be pkgdb, though I don't really
> > use it much myself:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/owncloud
> Thanks, it’s useful.
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/owncloud.git/tree/owncloud.spec is
> > our current 'state of the art', more or less.
> I’m not use to the .spec format, but it’s well enough documented to
> understand, thanks.
I think if you understand the basic concept of packaging it's not too
hard to figure out what's going on...at least it works in the other
direction, I don't really know the nuts and bolts of how .deb packaging
actually works but it's reasonably easy to find the interesting
customizations from a packages.debian.org page, I've found.
> Looks like https://github.com/owncloud/core/issues/4469 is getting
> resolved, but FYI, the mediawiki Debian package has been split to
> provide the classes independently.
Yeah, I considered that, but it seems not worth the effort if upstream's
going to stop using them. If anything we'd probably want a more
concerted effort to make js minifying consistent distro-wide, but that
sounds like a hell of a project :/
> Thanks to those file comments, I realize I overlooked (at least) the
> mediaelement stuff, on my way to have a closer look and fix that.
No probs. We found that because someone did a Fedora-wide sweep looking
for pre-built Flash and Silverlight blobs and found quite a lot - Debian
might be interested in doing the same thing, if it hasn't
already...other classic ones are TTFs and .exes, but I'd expect Debian
already has checks for those...
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
More information about the Pkg-owncloud-maintainers