[Pkg-pascal-devel] FPC 2.6.4 is released.

[Paul Gevers]

On 27-03-14 20:09, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> As I can see in the link, we may repackage in order to get the name of
> the parent directory conform to the standard,

Interesting. That is not how I read it. As I read it, IF you repack THEN
you should (not must) have the parent conform the standard. This is at
all not a reason to repack.

> Also removing many .o could reduce the size.

I think this is the ONLY reason we have.

> In the other hand, Makefiles are generated during the build process
> anyway, and thus should be remove if we repack.

No. The link explicitly states to not remove upstream makefiles.

> This avoids warnings about missing makefile after clean.

The current clean does not work if a build is aborted halfway. So we
need to fix it. I also don't understand what you mean, did you ever have
a warning that the Makefile was missing?

Paul

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 551 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20140327/e01458f2/attachment.sig>