[Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#742734: Bug#741792: Bug#741792: doublecmd: FTBFS: install: cannot stat '*.so*': No such file or directory
Mazen NEIFER
mazen.neifer at supaero.org
Mon Apr 7 17:39:36 UTC 2014
Hi All,
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 21:34 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 26-03-14 20:15, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > "Included *.lpk files in the binary packages and mark them as
> > manually compiled to avoid recompiling them when used." Apparently that
> > causes other side effects for build dependencies.
>
> I confirm that NOT marking these packages as manually compiled fixed the
> FTBFS for doublecmd.
I need to analyse more the failure, but the fact that rebuilding a
system build binary solves the issue does not mean that the issue is in
that binary. It is more like if some program needs to rebuild libc in
order to work in Debian, this is of course not a proof that there is a
bug in libc Debian package.
> Abou, can you please comment if you know a way to have the "manual"
> trick work for both gtk2 and qt4?
Please see my comments on my previous post. (Sorry this thread was badly
filtered and I just discovered it)
> Otherwise, I think I will fix this real soon in Lazarus to prevent
> removal from jessie.
Please don't remove the manual flag. Here, if I understood well, we are
dealing about an alpha feature which is QT support in LCL. So it could
not be a RC bug. Also upstream changed the way to handle LCL and the
user programs should upgrade.
Of course as a member of this team; I'll have a look at doublecmd
sources and try to fix it, so the way to go now is probably to lower the
severity of these bugs or to hope I can close them before the fatal
deadline of April 14th.
Cheers,
--
"It is as though Einstein's God had made sure that no one could ever
know enough to predict the future." Leonard Susskind, 2008.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20140407/9172d37f/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel
mailing list