[Pkg-pascal-devel] About ptop.cfg and fpc.cfg man pages

[Paul Gevers]

Hi all,

On 21-04-14 11:43, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> By the way, do you consider Lazarus now uploadable? As we need to pass
> also by the NEW queue, maybe we should push this soon.

Why? We already did that with the RC. So Lazarus is building as soon as
I upload, which I don't mind doing right now by the way. I thought you
wanted to look at it some more.

I am not fully satisfied with Lazarus yet, I don't like the qt/gtk
separation as it is. But that is not blocking. I am trying to figure out
how to do it best, but I have one big question to you: how did you
originally decide which files would go where
(lcl-units/lcl-nogui/lcl-gtk/lcl-qt). If you are confident that all the
qt/gtk files in lcl-units should be mere copies (and thus fixable with
softlinks) I am fine with the proper separation, but if there actually
should be a lot more files in lcl-gtk and lcl-qt from lcl-units, we need
to fix things. If softlinks could be created between lcl-qt and lcl-gtk
than I don't see the reason to have these four packages anyways (because
they would just depend on eachother). I couldn't find a reason (with the
current d/control file) why lcl-nogui exists, because lcl-units depends
on lcl-gtk|lcl-qt and lcl-gtk needs lcl-nogui (because they share a lot
of files). But of course, I made the dependency of lcl-gtk to lcl-nogui,
but for a good reason.

Paul


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 551 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20140421/87aaeced/attachment.sig>