[Pkg-pascal-devel] DFSG-ness of two
Francesco Poli
invernomuto at paranoici.org
Fri May 29 21:07:51 UTC 2015
On Fri, 29 May 2015 14:12:51 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Debian legal,
Hello Paul,
thanks for taking these freeness issues seriously.
>
> I am investigating two files in the Lazarus source with the following
> two licenses. I am wondering what you make of this
[...]
> First:
[...]
My own personal opinion is that the first license is really borderline,
although it could be considered to barely comply with the DFSG.
[...]
> - 3. You may not have any income from distributing this source
> - (or altered version of it) to other developers. When You
> - use this product in a comercial package, the source may
> - not be charged seperatly.
This clause is really annoying, but it seems to allow the file to be
sold as part of a commercial package. Hence, it could perhaps be
considered to meet DFSG#1.
Anyway, this first license should really be avoided: I recommend you to
get in touch with the copyright owner of this first file and try to
persuade him to re-license the file under widely used and clearly
DFSG-free terms.
I would suggest him to re-license under the zlib license [1], which is
the closest DFSG-free license I am aware of.
[1] http://www.zlib.net/zlib_license.html
>
> Second:
> Windows XP Theme Manager is freeware. You may freely use it in any
> software, including commercial software, provided you accept the
> following conditions:
> 1) The software may not be included into component collections and
> similar compilations which are sold. If you want to distribute this
> software for money then contact me first and ask for my permission.
[...]
The second license appears to be clearly non-free: it fails to
explicitly grant permission to copy, redistribute, and modify (it just
talks about "using", which is a vague term) and it absolutely forbids
anyone to sell aggregate software distributions containing the file,
thus failing to meet DFSG#1.
I recommend you to get in touch with the copyright owner of this second
file and try to persuade him to re-license the file under DFSG-free
terms, such as, for instance, the Expat license [2].
[2] http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt
I hope this helps.
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20150529/a9982665/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel
mailing list