[Pkg-pascal-devel] doublecmd backport to wheezy
Graham Inggs
graham at nerve.org.za
Mon Jun 1 11:36:14 UTC 2015
Hi Paul / Bruno
On 31/05/2015 13:33, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As main maintainer of doublecmd, what do you think? Shall I sponsor this
> with the Debian maintainers consent?
I haven't reviewed Bruno's packaging yet, but I have no objections if
you have and are happy to sponsor it.
> On 25-05-15 18:40, bruno zanetti wrote:
>> I'd be pleased to share a backport I made of doublecmd from jessie
>> (0.5.11-1) to wheezy. The only change I made (in debian/control) was to
>> force use of fp >= 2.6.4 and lcl >= 1.2 from wheezy-backports to avoid
>> FTBFS.
>
I think it would be better to backport 0.6.2-1 as upstream's changelog
[1] shows a long list of fixes since 0.5.11-1.
I'm not familiar with the backporting process, but I think this should
be possible.
Instead of forcing the use of fpc >= 2.6.4 and lcl >= 1.2, another way
of avoiding the FTBFS is to leave the build-depends on fpc and lcl as
they are and additionally build-depend on lazarus-src. I am thinking of
using this method for backporting doublecmd to Ubuntu Trusty. I don't
know which method is better suited for Debian backports.
Regards
Graham
[1] http://doublecmd.sourceforge.net/mantisbt/changelog_page.php
More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel
mailing list