[Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#813452: Bug#813452: fpc-3.0 regression in armhf and armel architectures
Abou Al Montacir
abou.almontacir at sfr.fr
Sun Feb 28 11:31:31 UTC 2016
Hi Paul,
On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 13:45 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> On 27-02-16 13:11, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > confirmed, with 3.1.1 on trunk I built it successfully.
>
> Great.
>
> > Do you think you can backport a patch?
>
> Once the required code has been found. Abou requested help from upstream
> to identify it.
>
> > I also tried to build with the current fpc and no fPIC for the pascal part,
> > and the build is successful.
> >
> > actually fPIC was broken also before, according to the Cmake file
> > if(${CMAKE_Pascal_COMPILER_VERSION} VERSION_GREATER 2.7 OR
> > ${CMAKE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURES} MATCHES "x86_64" OR
> > ${CMAKE_TARGET_ARCHITECTURES} MATCHES "i386")
> > add_flag_append(CMAKE_Pascal_FLAGS "-fPIC")
> > endif()
> >
> >
> > so, disabling it again is not a "real" regression :)
>
> Hmm, that also means we can lower the severity of this bug (no
> regression) and have it migrate to testing, agreed? I would leave this
> bug as important, but still have fpc 3 migrate to testing. Is anybody
> objecting?
>
> Proposal:
> control: retitle -1 fpc can not build -fPIC with -O2 on arm*
> control: severity -1 important
> control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
I agree
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20160228/b40672bd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel
mailing list