[Pkg-pascal-devel] Re Bug#813452: fpc-3.0 regression in armhf and armel architectures

Abou Al Montacir abou.almontacir at sfr.fr
Wed Mar 2 18:34:53 UTC 2016

Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 10:31 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 20:28 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Hi Abou
> > 
> > On 22-02-16 07:16, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > > I finally managed to find the wrong option! It is -fPIC.
> > > Below are  tests with only -fPIC and with only -O2.
> > 
> > Great find Abou. I am curious to see what comes out of this. I expect a
> > new bug report upstream.
> Upstream already asked for testing 3.1.1. I'm not sure I can do this this
> week.
> For me it is definitely an issue in 3.0.0 so yes maybe we can open an upstream
> bug.
> If you can manage to afford to compile 3.1.1 please let me know.
According to upstream we need to back-port the following fixes:
ARM PIC fixes: r31681, r31706, r31712, r31728, r31730, r31755
i386 PIC fixes: r32020, r32036, r32536
Abou Al Montacir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20160302/212fe845/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20160302/212fe845/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list