[Pkg-pascal-devel] Bug#813452: fpc-3.0 regression in armhf and armel architectures

Paul Gevers elbrus at debian.org
Tue Mar 15 20:36:43 UTC 2016

Hi Abou,

On 09-03-16 11:34, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>> I noticed. I was working on it as well. Would it make any different to
>> you to put all these changes into one patch? I think that makes it
>> easier to keep track of it after a while.
> I think it will be easier to backport them to next maintenance release
> in case upstream polls some of the commits and forget others.
> Usually upstream polls commit by commit to fixes branch. So the polled
> commits will just need to be removed.
> I also personally prefer handling small patches instead of a big one.
> But if you really like to cat them all together I don't mind.

You have good reasons. Leave it as is.

Furthermore, are we waiting for each other? Are you doing more testing?
Should somebody (me?) just build and upload?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20160315/9e4bb3eb/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list