[Pkg-pascal-devel] status of cross-binutils
Wookey
wookey at wookware.org
Thu Dec 22 23:10:20 UTC 2016
On 2016-12-01 21:47 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Wookey,
>
> Recently I got a cross build bug against FPC filed.¹ The reported did
> quite some digging himself and apparently a part of the solution is to
> (alternatively) depend on binutils-i586-linux-gnu (for i386) and similar
> for other archs. However, that package isn't in stretch, so I can't go
> that route now. Looking that the tracker package of cross-binutils, it
> seems that cross-binutils predates the current building of cross
> binutils by the binutils source package itself, correct? Shouldn't
> cross-binutils be removed
We have concluded that the cross-binutils packgage in Debian is now
superceded the cross-packages produced by binutils itself, and it has
just been removed.
> and couldn't/shouldn't binutils also build a
> i586 and x86_64 version?
Yes, I think so. I'll look into this now and file a bug and/or fix accordingly.
Wookey
--
Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
http://wookware.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20161222/c656c0f9/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-pascal-devel
mailing list