[Pkg-pascal-devel] defining architectures for fpc and lazarus ?

[Abou Al Montacir]

Hi All,On Sat, 2017-08-19 at 11:13 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Because of bug 859566¹, we need to file ROM bugs²³4 against
> ftp.debian.org every time we bump the version of the versioned packages
> of fpc and lazarus. I was wondering if we should prevent this by
> defining the archs we build on until bug 859566¹ is fixed.
> 
> You opinions please.
> 
> Paul
> 
> ¹ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859566 britney
> ² https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869076 (fpc)
> ³ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869077 (lazarus)
> 4 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870910 (fpc)
Do you mean that we change packages from all to binary?I'm not very fan with
this. But I don't really mind if you find it very heavy to fill these bugs and
think that fixing #859566 may take long time.
-- 
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20170819/953b9967/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-pascal-devel/attachments/20170819/953b9967/attachment.sig>